WHUT (Howard University Television)
55
55
Feb 14, 2013
02/13
by
WHUT
tv
eye 55
favorite 0
quote 0
v that kind of authority now when we move into the whole area of terrorism and counterterrorism and technologies that make it possible with a handful of individuals to destroy one of our cities then we're forced, i think, to think anew about our traditional ways of doing business, about how we make decisions, about how has the authority to make what decisions and that has, in fact, i think, probably generated is shift, if you will to the executive branch that the presidential authority is greater now than it was prior to 9/11. and basically for good reason. i don't always agree with the way it's used, but we felt an obligation to move aggressively along those lines. we didn't sit down and seiji we need more powers, we say how are we going to use the technical capability we have to intercept communication between al qaeda overseas and the people they're talking to here at home and what kind of authority do we need from the courts or from the congress. so we go through those exercises but i think it's driven by circumstance as much as it is by philosophy. >> rose: thank you. >> enjoyed it, charlie
v that kind of authority now when we move into the whole area of terrorism and counterterrorism and technologies that make it possible with a handful of individuals to destroy one of our cities then we're forced, i think, to think anew about our traditional ways of doing business, about how we make decisions, about how has the authority to make what decisions and that has, in fact, i think, probably generated is shift, if you will to the executive branch that the presidential authority is...
WHUT (Howard University Television)
35
35
Feb 16, 2013
02/13
by
WHUT
tv
eye 35
favorite 0
quote 0
so we think it is creating a dramatic change in how technologies can buy and use technology but also the innovation that you are going to see from customers. >> does anybody over 28 work for you? >> quite a few people. so probably the only reason we exist is that people over 28 also work for us. so we have a chief operating officer, a general manager at inopportunity for a couple years and he helped build a lot of the organizational and of our company but we think we have world-class talent sort of up and down the demographics and age ranges of the company. >> rose: what dow like other than business. >> hmmmm, well, i like pretending that i can play piano occasionally. >> rose: dow really. >> yeah, yeah. >> rose: who are your heroes. >> i have a lot. so probably just go on your web site and run through all of the shows that you've done. so i try and learn from a lot of people. >> rose: probably every one has been on this program. >> yeah. >> rose: from bill to steve jobs. >> you can learn-- you learn a little bit from everybody. so you can learn from bezos, katzenberg, from michael d
so we think it is creating a dramatic change in how technologies can buy and use technology but also the innovation that you are going to see from customers. >> does anybody over 28 work for you? >> quite a few people. so probably the only reason we exist is that people over 28 also work for us. so we have a chief operating officer, a general manager at inopportunity for a couple years and he helped build a lot of the organizational and of our company but we think we have...
WHUT (Howard University Television)
88
88
Feb 13, 2013
02/13
by
WHUT
tv
eye 88
favorite 0
quote 0
the white house and trying to do grassroots mobilization to not shoes the campaign infrastructure the technology the sophistication they have and to build from the out side to really do things in that way, mobilize the outside game. i think that is what he believes is the path to progress. >> charlie. >> rose: yes, mark. >> i think the president is remarkably consistent and i think in a second term he's kind of a fixed piece. the big changes for me, there's a new chief of staff a new secretary of treasury new secretary of state new secretary of defense. how all these people fit together as big parts of saying how the operation works. and i think the biggest piece was also a constant in some ways but his role that's fluctuated is the vice president. you talked to members of congress even republicans particularly in the senate and they will say we just don't have contact with the president, we don't have a feel for the president to be able to move things or stick with the agenda. they have great confidence in the vice president and great confidence in the vice president's ability as he showed in t
the white house and trying to do grassroots mobilization to not shoes the campaign infrastructure the technology the sophistication they have and to build from the out side to really do things in that way, mobilize the outside game. i think that is what he believes is the path to progress. >> charlie. >> rose: yes, mark. >> i think the president is remarkably consistent and i think in a second term he's kind of a fixed piece. the big changes for me, there's a new chief of...
WHUT (Howard University Television)
67
67
Feb 12, 2013
02/13
by
WHUT
tv
eye 67
favorite 0
quote 0
if it turns out we get another technology revolution like we did with the internet, then we have to cut back lessment i think it's fair to do a lot now but not too much, in 5, 7 years reevaluate where we stand. >> rose: but you want to get on a growth trajectory. >> and i'm-- . >> rose: that is your primary goal. >> that is my primary goal, growth trajectory in a sustainable way, that doesn't lead to huge debt, doesn't depend on huge debt or inflation. >> rose: how different is what you propose from what bowles simpson was. >> actually not that different. i mean, i think one of the key things that came out of the bowles simpson discussion was the idea of what i call the simpson bowles ratio, that it's a question of how much is done through spending cuts versus tax increases. and bowls simpson said we want it 2 for -- two times as much spending for every tax increase. and i think, frankly, the obama administration is going to come out of these negotiations well above that floor. meaning there is going to be-- . >> rose: 3 to 1. >> i think between 2.5 and 3 to 1. which is a big number. an
if it turns out we get another technology revolution like we did with the internet, then we have to cut back lessment i think it's fair to do a lot now but not too much, in 5, 7 years reevaluate where we stand. >> rose: but you want to get on a growth trajectory. >> and i'm-- . >> rose: that is your primary goal. >> that is my primary goal, growth trajectory in a sustainable way, that doesn't lead to huge debt, doesn't depend on huge debt or inflation. >> rose: how...